Thursday, March 17, 2016

Racism in A Biblical/Theological Perspective: Puerto Ricans in the Diaspora



                                                             Puerto Ricans in the Diaspora

This essay will focus on the presence of Puerto Ricans in the diaspora, i.e. the presence of Puerto Ricans in mainland U.S.A.  We ask why are so many Puerto Ricans in the U.S.A?  Any honest and serious student of history will know that the major factor in the presence of Puerto Ricans in the U.S.A. is due primarily to the colonization of our island by the U.S.A. after the Spanish-American War in 1898, and subsequently the economic chaos on the island generated by the colonization. It is precisely because of the colonial relationship between Puerto Rico and the U.S.A. that we make, for the purposes of this dialogue, a distinction between Puerto Ricans in the U.S.A., on the one hand, and on the other hand, Hispanics (Latinos) who come here from other countries.

Himilce Novas raises the questions as to why isn´t Puerto Rican migration considered immigration and how did it get started?  She informs us that since all Puerto Ricans are citizens-no matter if they dwell in San Juan or in San Francisco-and not foreigners, they can travel freely back and forth between the island and mainland U.S.A.  without passports or visas.  In other words, their movement constitutes the internal migration of Americans, not immigration.  Confusion abounds in mainstream society about Puerto Rican citizenship status.
Most mainland Puerto Rican mainlanders have a story or two to tell about the time they were asked about their green card or Puerto Rican currency, or Puerto Rico´s president, and more than one media pundit has pontificated on national television about the issue of ¨illegal Puerto Rican immigrants¨ in America (Himilce Novas, Everything You Need to Know About Latino History, p.154).

Puerto Ricans first came to the U.S.A. in the 1860´s.  After Puerto Rico was ceded to the U.S.A at the end of the Spanish-American War, more Puerto Ricans making their way to the U.S.A., and after 1917, when they were given U.S.A. citizenship, they began to settle or sojourn, an experience fraught with risks, uncertainty, and obstacles, including a language barrier, poverty, social isolation, and overt discrimination. In the early days, the majority went to Florida and New York to labor in cigar-making shops. Forty percent of those who arrived between 1890 and 1910 eventually returned to Puerto Rico (Novas, p. 155).

The first great wave of migration from Puerto Rico to mainland U.S.A took place only in the aftermath of World War II, and lasted until 1967.  The reasons were many, but they essentially boiled down to one issue: economics.  During World War II, about one hundred thousand Puerto Ricans had served in the U.S. military.  Military life exposed these islanders to the ¨superior" quality of life on the mainland, fueling their desire to move north.  In addition, Puerto Rico´s population doubled in size to two million during the first quarter of the twentieth century, and continued to grow at a rapid rate due to improvement in medical services.  With so many more people on the island, the standard of living did not rise substantially, and the unemployment rate soared.  By contrast, jobs on the mainland were plentiful.  New York City was a destination for Puerto Rican workers , who found low-paying labor intensive jobs in the manufacturing sector-which eagerly hired unskilled and semi-skilled workers-making apparel, shoes, toys, novelties, and electrical good, and assembling furniture and mattresses.  They also went to work in the food and hotel industries, the meatpacking, and baking industries, distribution, laundry service, and domestic service.  About half of all these workers were women (Novas, p. 155).

Since 1967, Puerto Rican islanders have settled on the mainland spurts, depending on the health of the U.S economy, and the mainland job market.  Those who went to New York City in the 1960´s generally wound up in manufacturing, even though this sector had already began a gradual decline as early as the 1950´s.   Then in the 1970´s,  New York City was gripped by a major financial crisis as businesses packed up and headed south and overseas in search of low-wage, non-union labor.  This shrinking of the manufacturing sector had a devastating effect on New York City´s Puerto Ricans , who generally did not have the formal education needed to fill in the white-collar jobs that were opening up in the city´s growing service sector (Novas, p. 156).

It should be added that for many decades, Puerto Rican migrant workers, about whom most Americans are not even aware, have worked on a season basis harvesting potatoes on Long Island, fruits and vegetables in New Jersey and New York tobacco in Connecticut, and sugar beets in Michigan (Novas, p. 156).

Puerto Ricans have historically been the most socially and economically disadvantaged of all Latinos.  In 1998, for instance, a full 30.9  percent of Puerto Ricans lived in poverty, and 43.5 percent of Puerto Rican children lived below the poverty level.  In 2000, approximately 40 of Puerto Ricans had slipped to or below the poverty line.  The depressed economic status of mainland Puerto Ricans has been attributed to a number of phenomena, such as the disproportionate number of Puerto Rican migrants settling stateside as compared to immigrant groups , owing to the fact that Puerto Rican´s U.S. citizenship removes all obstacles to entering the mainland.  Low levels of educational attainment, limited job skills, disease disparities (including a high incidence of diabetes, high blood pressure, and depression in the Puerto Rican community), and drug use have also been frequently cited as reasons for the economically underprivileged class of Puerto Ricans on the mainland.  Some social observers have suggested that the culprits underlying all these circumstances are rampant ethnic and racial discrimination; the language barrier, and the process of transculturation, of straddling the two cultures and two-languages, which is commonly accompanied by a disorienting sense of being ¨neither here nor there¨ (Novas, p. 157).

It is important to point out that the socio-economic status of mainland Puerto Ricans is advancing at a steady pace.  Large numbers of mainland Puerto Ricans hold professional, managerial, technical, and administrative support jobs, which are cornerstones of economic well-being.  Interestingly, Puerto Rican mainlanders who live outside of the Northeast have shown better economic outcomes than their counterparts in the Northeast, owing to their human capital and labor market characteristics (Novas, p. 158).

Two questions come into play here.  They are:

1.  How do we evaluate colonization from a biblical/theological perspective?

2.  How do we evaluate the status of second-class citizenship from a biblical/theological standpoint?

I have consistently maintained in these essays, that the grain of Scripture (especially the Gospel accounts) mitigates against both the illegal and immoral usurpation of land, on the one hand, and relegation of a group of people to second-class on the other.  I now invite you to share your perspective as to whether or not we can examine both colonialism and the lack of democratic rights in the context of the Christian tradition, and of theology as a whole.  Please feel free to share your views and how theology fits or does not fit into this discussion about colonization and discrimination.

In the Name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer. Amen.

Rev. Dr. Juan A. Ayala-Carmona

2 comments:

  1. Interesting reading. First, allow me to contribute my own story. Upon moving to Colorado from New York City, I rented a house from a woman who, when asked what nationality I was and I said Puerto Rican, she responded stating "oh, so you speak prortugueese." That's how little some people know about Puerto Ricans. Now regarding your statement that islanders came to the ¨superior" quality of life on the mainland, it is true that most came here to improve their economic situations. And even today, this remains true. As, even the lowest paying job here remains a better salary than most in Puerto Rio. My cousin, a teacher with a masters degree makes $14,000.00 in Puerto Rico.

    The fact remains that my parents did come here in hopes of making it better and despite the obstacles with discrimination, they did do better.

    Now I feel like one who described himself to Queen Elizabeth as "The Blank Page Between the Old and New Testament". We were looked upon, almost like the Jews in Europe who were called the "strange Poor". They were political refugees driven out of Russia bye the programs of the 19th Century.

    What we immediately did was to begin to assimilate. Assimilated was simply a means to try to fit in. We tried desperately not to be different. We rejected the sense of being the strange poor. The faster we assimilated the less uncomfortable we felt. Can there be such a thing as too much assimilation? Probably. But then again, there we were, the blank page between the old and New Testament. This is the place where two worlds came together and rubbed against each other, creating sparks with new insights and new beginnings. A new creation from both worlds yet belonging to neither. In the struggle of assimilation we still often remain incomplete. This incompleteness could come from racial/ethnic discrimination but it comes from many things. We block and are blocked from assimilation.

    Al in all, in my little world, or my personal family, most assimilated and reaped the benefit of being able to raise to a better standard of living and that I don't see any issue with. Ruth Ayala-Carmona

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ruth: Thank you so very much for your very insightful and very valuable insight and response. While it is very true that the majority of Puerto Ricans came here to better their lot, the question remains as to whether the vast majority accomplished what they set out to do. The other, and I think, major question of the essay was how do we evaluate the plight of the Puerto Ricans in the diaspora in the light of Scripture and theology? Does theology and the Christian tradition as a whole have any light to share on our social condition? Is there a theological response to racism and ethnic discrimination? Thanks again for your input. Juan Ayala-Carmona

      Delete